Review
Checked before it reaches you.
EXCEPTIONS SURFACEDBUILT FOR YOUR BUSINESS
Worktree maps a recurring business process, builds the agent workflow into your existing tools, then manages evaluations, quality control, and improvements after launch.
The cost of manual follow-through
Follow-ups, approvals, updates, and handoffs all matter. But when your best people carry them across tools by hand, they lose time for the work that actually transforms the business.
Worktree turns that follow-through into managed agent routines, so the business keeps moving and your team gets back its best hours.
Review
Checked before it reaches you.
EXCEPTIONS SURFACEDResearch
Data pulled from every tool.
SOURCES PULLEDAnalyze
What matters rises to the top.
PRIORITY FOUNDDraft
Replies and briefs ready to review.
DRAFT READYIllustrative workflow
Worktree should not feel like another place to chat with AI. A teammate triggers a known workflow, and the run moves live across systems with scope, approvals, artifacts, and history visible from start to finish.
Where to start
The best first workflow is recurring work your team already understands, but still handles manually because it needs context, judgment, and access to several systems.
Ready for a managed routine
Needs more definition first
Choose recurring work with clear inputs, business value, and a known way to judge success.
Capture the systems, rules, exceptions, approvals, handoffs, and expected outputs behind the work.
Create the agent workflow, connect the tools, define boundaries, test real cases, and launch it where the work already happens.
Review real runs against the agreed standard, fix weak spots, and make focused improvements that keep the workflow reliable.
How it works
We map how the work happens today, build the agent workflow, insert it into daily operations, and manage quality after launch so each routine can prove itself in production.
Managed quality
After launch, we review real runs against the agreed standard, watch approvals and exceptions, and make focused improvements that keep the workflow reliable.
We agree what good looks like before launch, then use that standard to review real workflow runs.
Sensitive steps stay visible, with human approvals reviewed after launch so the routine keeps the right boundaries.
Failures, edge cases, missing context, and unclear handoffs are tracked from live runs instead of hidden in chat history.
We ship targeted fixes from evidence, not broad rebuilds, so quality improves without expanding the workflow scope.